Palin Eyes Role in New Star Trek Series

Fresh from her announcement that she’s accepting a position on Fox comes bigger leaked news.  Former governor Sarah Palin is in negotiations for a lead role on a new Star Trek series, tentatively titled Star Trek: Reckoning, going into production this fall, ready to be aired on both Paramount and Fox in the Fall of 2011.  

If she accepts, Palin would play Captain Nalia Fergus of the USS Steadfast, one of the ships convinced of an upcoming battle which the Federation won’t take seriously.  Unlike past series, this series concentrates on multiple ships and the Federation–so some political intrigue.  Palin, of course, has to be a “rogue” captain! [I love it!]  

The series takes place after Voyager, with an expansive Federation, a bit more difficult to govern, a bit too relaxed.  The title, Reckoning, refers to an Armageddon-like disaster predicted by the D’mi, a culture that sees dreams as predictions of the future.  They’ve had a collective, planet-wide dream that involves the whole Federation, but very few are listening.  The show is about their attempts to convince the Federation to do something about an impending attack that could destroy multiple sectors.  In the premiere and first season, they are able to convince three ships, who will work tirelessly through the series to undermine the current administration, all while trying to create alliances with other ships through deception, manipulation and controlling the media.

The President of the Federation, a very powerfully-minded, but peaceful, Betazed, is unphased by a dreaming culture predicting doom.  Fergus, believing D’mi predictions, forms an underground alliance with two other ships (writers are arguing over names like the USS Sun Tzu, USS Pearl Harbor, and the USS Buchanan) to protect Section 001, Earth.  This show will be about a bit of infighting in the Federation.  

“They’ve done it before,” says one of the writers.  “The TNG episode, Conspiracy, the Maquis, and the Dominion, and even the threats of Species 8472–but these were mostly alien attacks, people posing as humans.  The Maquis sequence really opened up the door to talking about multiple sides within the Federation–or even political parties,” say writers who want to remain anonymous till Paramount’s April announcement. 

Still they’re excited about the series.  And about these rogue captains.  “They really distrust the President.  He’s too peaceful.  He can read their minds–which they hate.  He’s a negotiator, a diplomat, at a time when they feel like war is coming. The constant question on the table will be–are the D’mi’s dreams really accurate, do they have a political agenda, and at what moment do you take matters into your own hands?”  

One of them quipped, “It’s kind of like writing a series in the Mirror Universe, except this one is bad.”

The coolest thing is that Fergus’ first officer is Commander Nuuk, a walking, talking polar bear from some ice planet.  Earth apparently dropped off its Arctic species on this planet (yeah, climate change wiped them out on Earth) and they mixed with the indigenous life there–very similar–so you get a polar bear.  Fergus used to hunt bears.  Nuuk doesn’t know that, so this is going to be a source of tension, as she doesn’t want to admit it, but thinks of him as a trophy first officer.  She’s gonna have a D’mi onboard too–who has these waking dreams–who’s living in both reality and fantasy all the time, but can’t tell the difference.  

These are three ships full of conservatives.  I do think that a ship of conservatives gives the writers what they’ve always waited for–the ability to write in closeted gay characters.  There won’t be much open romantic intrigue because everyone’s uptight, not wanting to be revealed.  

Palin has expressed interest, according to one former aide in Alaska.  “She likes the character.  It’s so much like her–bold, aggressive hunting woman, now commanding a starship of conservatives, who move with her every command.  They fight for Earth, and they seek to protect the planet from its own bad judgment.”  

Palin is reportedly brushing up on Federation policies, which like Kirk, she will ignore and bend at will, and she’s learning Klingon–just in case.  She does have some concerns.  She’s asked to be written in as a mother, with small children on board the ship.  She wants to be assured of a four year gig (no death in season two).  She also wants to have her own ghost writer write in folksy things she would normally say, but now in a command-sort of way.”  

Paramount and Fox want to give her as much latitude as possible.  “We’ve never been able to pick up this demographic.  Usually we just get intelligent, science-oriented, techno geeks with a liberal, compassionate viewpoint.  We have the potential to scoop Red State America–the O’Reilly viewers,” says one assistant producer.  “We wouldn’t just have a fan base–we’d have an electorate!” 

McCain, a trekkie since William Shatner was a child, has said he’d always wondered how the Earth in Star Trek ever resolved pluralistic ideas.  “Never made sense to me why everyone agreed on Earth.  What happened to pluralism?”  And he has a point.  How did this series eliminate differences of opinions?  Where did the all Israeli ship go?  Or the Chinese ships?  Where were the rivals to get spaceships into space?   Did they sabotage each other?  Surely there was more fighting before we conquered space.  This series, McCain indicates, will “bring back the lipstick in realistic.”  No one knows exactly what he means.  

It does bring up interesting possibilities for the writers.  Could they keep the Star Trek fan base intact–those rooting for the Federation?  But those fans just might like a quirky, folksy rogue captain–plucky enough to cause a conservative revolution.  

Palin as Captain of her own ship?  What do you think?  She does wear red well.

 

 Shatner giving Palin the baton, the formal written permission to be as “rogue as she wants to be.”

____________________________

(this is, of course, a parody.  A wink to Sarah Palin.)

 

For more on the new Star Trek Series, don’t miss these entries:  Gingrich as D’mi, and Palin citing Star Trek to promote Gun Rights  and Red State America Wants Their Star Trek

18 thoughts on “Palin Eyes Role in New Star Trek Series

  1. Decius January 13, 2010 / 9:59

    Ok, now that I have stopped laughing. DUDE!
    That was well done and clever bit of writing though you were a little too obvious when you started to mention the possible ship names. Probably something a little more subtle there would have worked better. Otherwise a very funny bit of fabrication.

    BTW if you want to see some of the possible future of Star Trek go to the Star Trek Online website and read the section “The Path to 2409” and “STO and Abrams”.

  2. jstueart January 13, 2010 / 9:59

    Thanks Dave! I changed the names back to what I had. I wanted to make sure people didn’t think this was real news….so I pushed the names of the ships a bit. Now they are back! Let the deception begin! I’ll check out the site. Looking forward to Saturday.

  3. Mark March 12, 2010 / 9:59

    How has McCain liked Star Trek since William Shatner was a child when William Shatner starred in the Original Series?

  4. jstueart March 12, 2010 / 9:59

    It’s a joke about his age–it’s supposed to be ridiculous.

  5. Steve April 17, 2010 / 9:59

    Rofl Palin?… well she’s a shite politician, maybe acting would be more her forte.

    • Thomas June 27, 2010 / 9:59

      Had me going. I’m glad its only a fabrication. I thought crap the conservatives are trying to meddle with star trek!!??
      I had resolved NOT to watch, in protest. hahahaha

      Shame on your for nearly giving me a heart attack.

      • Heather November 21, 2010 / 9:59

        Same here! Yikes!

  6. Laurie May 3, 2010 / 9:59

    Love it!

  7. jstueart May 3, 2010 / 9:59

    Laurie,

    I knew you’d see some of our work in there!

  8. Niall November 6, 2010 / 9:59

    On the other hand, if she was cast as Anna in V, she wouldn’t have to try acting.

  9. Heather November 21, 2010 / 9:59

    I was momentarily traumatized by this and about to look for the petition to have it stopped! DUDE, when you spoof, you really spoof! Hopefully, this doesn’t haunt my nightmares 😉

  10. Monty Frick December 18, 2010 / 9:59

    I’m more disheartened by the fact that there really is no new Star Trek series in the works.

    • jstueart December 19, 2010 / 9:59

      Me too. I would even take Palin as the new lead just to see Star Trek again….

  11. Jerry June 1, 2011 / 9:59

    Hey to all you star trek Liberals Iv loved star trek since i was 2 years old so dont think star trek is about Liberal ideas only or the only people who watch star trek lean to the left you would be very mistaken plus star trek is kinda conservative do you think riker or kirk would want you to take there guns away no i think not lol plus if it was the women wouldnt be wearing short skirts in the original series they would have pants haha im just saying back up off my star trek ……P.s I dont think star trek had Affirmative action did they haha….and before you call me a racist benjamin sisqo was my second favorite captain 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s